Reflections on RPI-X regulation in OECD countries
Utilities Policy, 2014, vol. 31, issue C, 197-202
The form of regulation initially proposed by the Littlechild (1983) report has not only been implemented in UK regulated industries, but has also become a benchmark approach to regulation worldwide. RPI-X has been widely adopted in different industries in OECD countries both to incentivise efficiency and also to support privatisation, and this paper shows the breadth of countries and industries in which it has been applied. It has also contributed to the development of infrastructure as a separate asset class. It is difficult to overstate the long-term impact of the 1983 paper. However, the precise way in which RPI-X regulation is implemented differs widely. On occasions, a price control process is implemented largely because it is a well-respected benchmark approach, but with less appreciation of the intended objectives. Designers of regulatory frameworks would do well to recall the analysis in the original Littlechild paper which highlighted that regulation is not an end in itself, but a means to an end, and successful applications of the framework respect this.
Keywords: Infrastructure; Utility investment; RAB (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:juipol:v:31:y:2014:i:c:p:197-202
Access Statistics for this article
Utilities Policy is currently edited by D. Smith
More articles in Utilities Policy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Haili He ().