EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Incentives for cost reduction and cost padding in electricity markets with overlapping “green” regulations

Kevin Currier

Utilities Policy, 2016, vol. 38, issue C, 72-75

Abstract: We examine overlapping regulations in electricity markets. Using an example based on a stylized model of a competitive energy market, we study cost-reduction and cost-padding incentives by “green-energy” producers in an electricity market employing an emissions tax and the simultaneous use of a green quota for the generation portfolio and a fair rate-of-return constraint implemented via a system of feed-in tariffs. We show inter alia that when subsidies are phased out, exploitation of the green technologies full cost-reduction potential is a Nash Equilibrium but emissions will increase. In addition, green-energy producers can engage in collusive cost padding to increase profits even as they satisfy the policymaker's desired green quota.

Keywords: Renewable energy; Feed-in-tariff; Cost padding; Incentives; Nash equilibrium (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q48 Q58 H23 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3) Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957178715300606
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:juipol:v:38:y:2016:i:c:p:72-75

DOI: 10.1016/j.jup.2015.10.004

Access Statistics for this article

Utilities Policy is currently edited by D. Smith

More articles in Utilities Policy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Haili He ().

 
Page updated 2020-08-03
Handle: RePEc:eee:juipol:v:38:y:2016:i:c:p:72-75