Which asset valuation and depreciation method should be used for regulated utilities? An analytical and simulation-based comparison

Hans-Ulrich Küpper and Burkhard Pedell

Utilities Policy, 2016, vol. 40, issue C, 88-103

Abstract: Capital charges constitute the major share of costs in regulated network industries; in regulatory practice, however, no universally accepted method of depreciation exists. This paper compares the most commonly used asset valuation and depreciation methods according to their provision of adequate investment incentives, their compatibility with market developments, and their consistency with financial accounting principles. Current replacement-cost and annuity depreciation are found to be the most advantageous methods. The structural differences between these two methods are presented in detail. A simulation analysis indicates that the differences among the depreciation methods are less pronounced for sets of multiple assets but remain very large for certain parameter constellations, particularly those with substantial asset price changes and long asset lives.

Keywords: Asset valuation; Depreciation method; Rate regulation; Monte Carlo simulation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957178716301151
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:juipol:v:40:y:2016:i:c:p:88-103

DOI: 10.1016/j.jup.2016.05.001

Access Statistics for this article

Utilities Policy is currently edited by Beecher, Janice

More articles in Utilities Policy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().