Quantifying the capacity value of natural gas efficiency in New England
Nathaniel Gilbraith,
Paulina Jaramillo and
Inês Lima Azevedo
Utilities Policy, 2018, vol. 50, issue C, 101-110
Abstract:
Natural gas utilities in New England face increasing natural gas transmission system congestion and volatile spot gas prices. We observe that prevailing evaluation methods for natural gas efficiency programs value avoided firm pipeline capacity based on its total (‘gross') cost. We propose, consistent with deregulated electricity markets, to value avoided firm pipeline capacity at its ‘net’ cost. Specifically, we account for revenues associated with selling excess capacity during periods when the firm capacity holder does not fully utilize its rights. Our evaluation of commercial building efficiency programs suggests that prevailing evaluation methods could over-estimate the value of efficiency programs when those programs are intended to offset new capacity investments (i.e., the utility is in need of additional firm capacity). The situation is more complex for a utility with sufficient firm pipeline capacity to meet forecast load (i.e., consumption). In this case, the prevailing evaluation methods have the potential to under- or over-estimate the value of efficiency programs. The value of avoided infrastructure investments is likely to vary with the specific circumstances of the utility and the expected revenues associated with short-term sales enabled by available capacity. In the future, we recommend that economic regulators of natural gas distribution utilities, the state public utility commissions (PUCs), value avoided infrastructure investments at the ‘net' cost of the investment instead of the ‘gross' cost.
Date: 2018
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095717871630100X
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:juipol:v:50:y:2018:i:c:p:101-110
DOI: 10.1016/j.jup.2017.11.003
Access Statistics for this article
Utilities Policy is currently edited by Beecher, Janice
More articles in Utilities Policy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().