Assessing landowners’ preferences to inform voluntary private land conservation: The role of non-monetary incentives

Gonzalo Cortés-Capano, Nick Hanley, Oleg Sheremet, Anna Hausmann, Tuuli Toivonen, Gustavo Garibotto-Carton, Alvaro Soutullo and Enrico Di Minin

Land Use Policy, 2021, vol. 109, issue C

Abstract: Private land conservation (PLC) is an increasingly recognized strategy to help address the global biodiversity crisis. Understanding landowners’ context-dependent preferences for different PLC policies is key to designing and implementing successful voluntary strategies aiming to foster participation and long-term engagement. However, funding shortfalls and diverse cultural values mean that traditional approaches such as land acquisition or payment for ecosystem services policies may not be the best approaches to increase landowners’ participation in PLC. In this study, we examine landowners’ preferences for monetary and non-monetary incentives and how these might increase participation in PLC. We also address a geographical gap in PLC literature by assessing landowners’ preferences for voluntary PLC policies in Uruguay, a country located in the Río de la Plata Grasslands ecoregion (South America), one of the most endangered and least protected biomes worldwide. This case study provides a useful test-bed of non-monetary incentives, since 96% of the land is privately owned and no voluntary PLC strategies are in place yet. Using a choice experiment, we found that landowners were more willing to engage in voluntary PLC if policies align with their values and needs. Non-monetary incentives, such as access to training and technical support, were preferred over monetary payments, highlighting opportunities to develop context-specific policies that would foster environmental stewardship and long-term engagement. Designing policies by including a diverse set of instruments, flexible contract lengths, and integrating the context-specific social and cultural characteristics underlying landowners’ identities and values, are crucial aspects for increasing participation.

Keywords: Choice experiment; Policy instruments; Sustainability; Cultural landscapes; Biodiversity conservation; Stewardship (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (7)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837721003495
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:109:y:2021:i:c:s0264837721003495

DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105626

Access Statistics for this article

Land Use Policy is currently edited by Jaap Zevenbergen

More articles in Land Use Policy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Joice Jiang ().