Structured decision-making shows broad support from diverse stakeholders for habitat conservation and restoration in Kenya’s Central Highlands

Gwili E.M. Gibbon, Martin Dallimer, Hassan Golo, Humphrey Munene, Charlene A. Wandera, Monda N. Edson, Jane C. Gachura, Tim Hobbs, Festus Ihwagi, Stephen R. Ikhamati, Samson K. Ikiara, David Kimathi, Francis B. Lenyakopiro, James M. Mwamodenyi, John Mwiti, Rachael Mundia, Justuce Mureithi, Godfrey Mwogora, Priscilla K. Ndiira, Redempta Njeri, Jerenimo Lepirei, Craig Outram, Phineas Rewa, Maurice Schutgens, Silvano Simiyu, Sven Verwiel, Antony Wandera, Don White, Robert J. Smith and Zoe G. Davies

Land Use Policy, 2024, vol. 147, issue C

Abstract: The need for targeted restoration in regions where ecosystem integrity has become compromised is now widely recognised. Local community views, alongside those of other stakeholders, should be incorporated into transparent decision-making to ensure conservation/restoration activities are successful. We used a structured decision-making approach, working with stakeholders and local communities, to pose and answer the following question for Kenya’s Central Highlands: “what future land-use options [2030] are feasible for the study region, which is most preferable, how does this vary between different stakeholder groups, and what values drive these preferences?”. We engaged with 51 individuals from six stakeholder groups (Big Farms, Conservationists, Counties, Forest Users, Pastoralists, Smallholders). As individuals, the stakeholders held significantly different values for provisioning, cultural, regulation and maintenance ecosystem services. However, following consensus-building activities within the six groups, shared values and perspectives emerged. The future land-use option of habitat conservation/restoration was preferred by the majority of stakeholder groups, although one (Big Farms) favoured increased plantation forestry. Water resource management was also prioritised consistently. By using structured decision-making, we demonstrate that ecosystem restoration is compatible with the views and values of smallholders and forest users, as well as those with a direct interest in conservation. Structured decision-making processes can facilitate stakeholders with disparate views to work towards a consensus regarding future land-use options, aiding environmental planning and implementation.

Keywords: Connectivity; Ecosystem services; Land-use change; Local communities; Kenya; Multi-criteria decision analysis (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S026483772400317X
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:147:y:2024:i:c:s026483772400317x

DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2024.107364

Access Statistics for this article

Land Use Policy is currently edited by Jaap Zevenbergen

More articles in Land Use Policy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Joice Jiang ().