A benefit-sharing model for hydropower projects based on stakeholder input-output analysis: A case study of the Xiluodu Project in China

Bingqing Xia, Maoshan Qiang, Wenchao Chen, Qixiang Fan, Hanchen Jiang and Nan An

Land Use Policy, 2018, vol. 73, issue C, 341-352

Abstract: The rich hydro resources and global pressures of greenhouse gas emission have promoted the rapid development of hydropower projects in China. However, the benefit distribution unfairness in hydropower projects leads to problems such as resettlement conflicts, which significantly hinder the sustainable development of hydro resources. In order to determine a reasonable benefit sharing policy system, this study employs a new perspective, which treats the reservoir migrants as a formal project stakeholder rather than the passive “compensation receivers” previous practices have considered them to be. From this perspective, this study 1) identifies the stakeholders of hydropower projects and their input/output factors based on stakeholder theories, and highlights the four most important core stakeholders, i.e., government, hydropower generation enterprises, reservoir migrants, and power grid enterprises; 2) designs a specific calculation method for the four core project stakeholders’ cash flows and establishes a quantitative benefit-sharing model based on the input-output analysis; and 3) employs the Xiluodu Project in China as a case study to demonstrate the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed method. Theoretically, the change in reservoir migrants’ status in the project delivery framework provides a new perspective for benefit sharing and resettlement studies. Practically, this study establishes a feasible quantitative tool for the description and assessment of benefit sharing systems, and the overall assessment of hydropower projects. The results of the case study show that, under the current benefit distribution policy of China, yields of reservoir migrants are significantly lower than those of other core stakeholders. The results also indicate that, by increasing resettlement compensation standards and slightly adjusting the electricity generation price, all core stakeholders’ yields can reach a more rational and fair level.

Keywords: Hydropower projects; Benefit sharing; Stakeholder; Xiluodu project; Resettlement (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (6)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837716307967
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:73:y:2018:i:c:p:341-352

DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.02.002

Access Statistics for this article

Land Use Policy is currently edited by Jaap Zevenbergen

More articles in Land Use Policy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Joice Jiang ().