Evolving practice in land demarcation

Benito Arruñada

Land Use Policy, 2018, vol. 77, issue C, 661-675

Abstract: This paper analyzes social choice with respect to the demarcation of land boundaries, distinguishing between physical and legal demarcation. In contrast with the influential “land administration” literature and the World Bank’s policy guidelines, the analysis supports voluntary—instead of mandatory—demarcation as well as non-integrated services for land administration. Consistent with these theoretical arguments, the paper empirically verifies that demarcation conflicts play a lesser role in title-, land- and property-related litigation, which seems to increase in all these areas after physical demarcation is made mandatory. Relying on World Bank data, it also observes that linking and merging cadastres and land registries does not correlate with lower transaction costs.

Keywords: Land; Property; Boundaries; Surveying; Cadastres; Land registry; Land administration (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D73 K11 K25 K34 K41 L85 O17 O18 Q15 Q24 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (8)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837717313716
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
Working Paper: Evolving Practice in Land Demarcation (2018)
Working Paper: Evolving practice in land demarcation (2018)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:77:y:2018:i:c:p:661-675

DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.05.050

Access Statistics for this article

Land Use Policy is currently edited by Jaap Zevenbergen

More articles in Land Use Policy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Joice Jiang ().