EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Fisheries relations in the Gulf of Maine Implications of an arbitrated maritime boundary

Glen J Herbert

Marine Policy, 1995, vol. 19, issue 4, 301-316

Abstract: In 1984, the International Court of Justice drew, "in accordance with the principles and rules of international law", a single maritime boundary dividing the maritime jurisdictions of the US and Canada in the Gulf of Maine. The nature of third-party adjudication meant that the allocation of regional fish resources occurred solely through the geographic delimitation of a line. The lack of prior agreement on fisheries access and management greatly hindered the opportunity of obtaining a functional boundary in the context of international arbitration. As a result, US and Canadian administration of the boundary has been protectionist in nature, focussing on its function as divisive line. This has limited effective bilateral cooperation in the management and conservation of shared fish resources. The maintenance of incompatible fisheries management approaches on opposite sides of the boundary has contributed to overfishing and stock depletion in the region. In addition, the disruption of historical fishing patterns in the area has created a serious violation problem along the boundary. Since 1984, there have been numerous incidents of illegal fishing in Canadian waters by American scallop vessels. In response, Canadian fisheries management policy has focussed on the deterrence of US boundary violations through various means of surveillance, detection, and enforcement.

Date: 1995
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0308-597X(95)00021-W
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:marpol:v:19:y:1995:i:4:p:301-316

Access Statistics for this article

Marine Policy is currently edited by Eddie Brown

More articles in Marine Policy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:eee:marpol:v:19:y:1995:i:4:p:301-316