Ordinally Bayesian incentive compatible probabilistic voting rules
Dipjyoti Majumdar and
Souvik Roy
Mathematical Social Sciences, 2021, vol. 114, issue C, 11-27
Abstract:
We study probabilistic voting rules in a two-voter model. The notion of incentive compatibility we consider is ordinal Bayesian incentive compatibility (OBIC) as introduced in d’Aspremont and Peleg (1988). We show that there exist anonymous and ex-post efficient probabilistic voting rules that are not random dictatorships and at the same time are OBIC with respect to an independently distributed generic prior. This contrasts with the results obtained for deterministic voting mechanisms obtained in Majumdar and Sen (2004) and in Mishra (2016). In case of neutral and efficient rules, there are two kinds of results. First we show that imposing OBIC with respect to some generic prior leads to random dictatorship when there are three alternatives. Second, we show that the result is no longer true when there are four or more alternatives and consequently we provide sufficient conditions on the priors for the result to be true.
Keywords: Probabilistic voting rules; Ordinal Bayesian incentive-compatibility; Random dictatorial rules (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165489621001001
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:matsoc:v:114:y:2021:i:c:p:11-27
DOI: 10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2021.09.002
Access Statistics for this article
Mathematical Social Sciences is currently edited by J.-F. Laslier
More articles in Mathematical Social Sciences from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().