The problem of meaningfulness: Weber's law, Guilford's power law, and the near-miss-to-Weber's law

Thomas Augustin

Mathematical Social Sciences, 2009, vol. 57, issue 1, 117-130

Abstract: The present paper provides reformulations of common models of discrimination, like for instance, Weber's law, Guilford's power law, and the near-miss-to-Weber's law. All models are based on the assumption that the model parameters might depend on the underlying physical stimulus scale by which the physical intensities are measured. By discussing the meaningfulness of the model parameters, we come to the conclusion that the near-miss-to-Weber's law can be applied to physical quantities which are measured on a ratio-, interval-, or log-interval scale, whereas applications of Weber's law and Guilford's power law are necessarily restricted to physical ratio scales. Finally, we discuss the meaningfulness of an empirically based submodel of the near-miss-to-Weber's law, referred to as fixed-point model. The results show that, from a theoretical point of view, the fixed-point model is superior to Guilford's power law and the near-miss-to-Weber's law.

Keywords: Weber's; law; Guilford's; power; law; Near-miss-to-Weber's; law; Parameters; Scale; type; Meaningfulness (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2009
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165-4896(08)00084-X
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:matsoc:v:57:y:2009:i:1:p:117-130

Access Statistics for this article

Mathematical Social Sciences is currently edited by J.-F. Laslier

More articles in Mathematical Social Sciences from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().