Second-best mechanisms in queuing problems without transfers:The role of random priorities
Francis Bloch ()
Mathematical Social Sciences, 2017, vol. 90, issue C, 73-79
This paper characterizes the second-best mechanism chosen by a benevolent planner under incentive compatibility constraints in queuing problems without monetary transfers. In the absence of monetary compensations, separation between types can only occur if jobs are processed with a probability strictly smaller than one for some configurations of the types. This entails a large efficiency cost, and the planner optimally chooses a pooling contract when types are drawn from a continuous distribution and when binary types are sufficiently close. In the binary model, a separating contract is optimal when the difference between high and low types is large, and results in a low probability of processing jobs when both agents announce high types.
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:matsoc:v:90:y:2017:i:c:p:73-79
Access Statistics for this article
Mathematical Social Sciences is currently edited by J.-F. Laslier
More articles in Mathematical Social Sciences from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Haili He ().