Is Japanese management superior? Evidence from the performance of the USA targets in partial acquisitions

Stanko Racic

Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 2010, vol. 20, issue 1, 14-34

Abstract: This paper examines the efficacy of Japanese management and corporate governance by comparing the long-term post-merger operating performance of the U.S. targets acquired by Japanese bidders compared to the performance of well-matched U.S. targets of U.S. bidders. Unlike prior studies that focus on short-term stock price reactions of target firms, it is possible to undertake this long-term analysis of performance by identifying targets that survive as independent entities because of partial acquisitions. The findings suggest that targets of Japanese bidders either perform no differently from targets of U.S. bidders, or possibly even underperform. Thus, the evidence does not support the oft-claimed superiority of Japanese management and corporate governance system.

Keywords: Japanese; corporate; governance; Mergers; and; acquisitions; Long-term; performance; Post-acquisition; financial; and; accounting; data (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2010
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1042-444X(09)00035-8
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:mulfin:v:20:y:2010:i:1:p:14-34

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Multinational Financial Management is currently edited by I. Mathur and G. G. Booth

More articles in Journal of Multinational Financial Management from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().