Profit skimming, asymmetric benchmarking, or the effects of implicit incentives? Evidence from natural disasters
Syed Walid Reza
Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 2020, vol. 57-58
Abstract:
We evaluate competing hypotheses on profit skimming, asymmetric benchmarking, and the effects of implicit incentives using natural disasters as shocks to firm-specific performance. We find that compensation of both CEOs and other top executives are adjusted for exogenous changes in firm-specific performance. Moreover, the change in pay-for-performance sensitivity is greater for favorably rather than adversely affected firms. These results are stronger in firms with independent boards, new outside CEOs, and younger CEOs, where optimal contracting is more likely. Overall, our results support Feriozzi’s (2011) hypothesis that asymmetric pay-for-performance sensitivity can result from implicit incentives, which trigger after negative shocks.
Keywords: CEO compensation; Pay-For-Luck; Benchmarking; Natural disasters (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: G30 G34 J31 Q54 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1042444X20300438
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:mulfin:v:57-58:y:2020:i::s1042444x20300438
DOI: 10.1016/j.mulfin.2020.100654
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Multinational Financial Management is currently edited by I. Mathur and G. G. Booth
More articles in Journal of Multinational Financial Management from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu (repec@elsevier.com).