When are uninformed boards preferable?
Naoto Isaka
Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 2017, vol. 46, issue PA, 191-211
Abstract:
In this study, I analyze the optimal choice of a board of directors using a theoretical model. In my model, shareholders choose either an informed board that can bring additional private information to the firm or an uninformed board that merely considers the inside information already available within the firm. Then, the board randomly chooses a good chief executive officer (CEO) who has inside information or a bad CEO without such information. Next, the CEO decides whether to consult with the board when making a project decision. I show that shareholders generally choose an informed board in order to maximize the firm's value by utilizing the private information available to the board. However, shareholders optimally select an uninformed board if the CEO is reluctant to communicate with an informed board out of fear that it will reject his/her decisions. The uninformed board is also optimal when it derives a sufficiently large private benefit from monitoring the CEO, the cost of choosing the informed board is large, or the firm is involved in many unrelated businesses, especially when the inside information is valuable and many outsiders are needed to observe useful outside information. Some of these implications are used to discuss recent trends in the board structures of Japanese firms.
Keywords: Corporate governance; Optimal choice of board of directors; Informed and uninformed boards; Board structure of Japanese firms (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: G30 G34 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0927538X17303669
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:pacfin:v:46:y:2017:i:pa:p:191-211
DOI: 10.1016/j.pacfin.2017.08.003
Access Statistics for this article
Pacific-Basin Finance Journal is currently edited by K. Chan and S. Ghon Rhee
More articles in Pacific-Basin Finance Journal from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().