Leaving the (fund) gate ajar: Investor protection or marketing ploy?

Cecilia Wei Hu, Peter Lam and Adrian D. Lee

Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 2024, vol. 83, issue C

Abstract: Using a sample of active equity funds in China, we explore for the first time mutual funds that impose discretionary inflow restrictions (gates) on investors. Contrary to managers' claim, we find no compelling evidence that inflow gates serve to protect investor interests. Despite their superior past performance, inflow-restricted funds exhibit a significant decline in subsequent returns. In addition, funds tilt toward a riskier investment strategy when a gate is in place. Our analyses reveal that partly-closed gates further exacerbate investors' chasing of past returns, attracting extra flows and locking in more retail investors. Overall, we suggest that leaving the fund gate ajar to investors appears to be more of a marketing ploy than a form of investor protection. Our findings carry important implications for mutual fund investors, asset managers, and policy makers alike.

Keywords: Mutual funds; Inflow gate; Inflow restrictions; Fund marketing; Retail investors; Emerging fund market (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: G11 G23 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0927538X23002986
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:pacfin:v:83:y:2024:i:c:s0927538x23002986

DOI: 10.1016/j.pacfin.2023.102227

Access Statistics for this article

Pacific-Basin Finance Journal is currently edited by K. Chan and S. Ghon Rhee

More articles in Pacific-Basin Finance Journal from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().