Small business set-asides in procurement auctions: An empirical analysis

Jun Nakabayashi

Journal of Public Economics, 2013, vol. 100, issue C, 28-44

Abstract: As part of public procurement, many governments adopt small business programs to provide contract opportunities for businesses often with preferences for firms operated by members of groups designated as disadvantaged. The redistribution arising from such programs, however, can introduce significant additional costs to government procurement budgets. In this paper, the extent to which small business set-asides increased government procurement costs is examined. The estimates employ data on Japanese public construction projects, where approximately half of the procurement budget is set aside for small and medium enterprises (SMEs). Applying a positive relationship between profitability and firm size obtained by the nonparametric estimation of an asymmetric first-price auction model with affiliated private values, a counterfactual analysis is undertaken to demonstrate that approximately 40percent of SMEs would exit the procurement market if set-asides were removed. Surprisingly, the resulting lack of competition would increase government procurement costs more than it would offset the production cost inefficiency.

Keywords: Procurement auctions; Small business set-asides; Nonparametric estimation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D44 H23 H57 L74 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2013
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (41)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047272713000169
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
Working Paper: Small Business Set-asides in Procurement Auctions: An Empirical Analysis (2010)
Working Paper: Small Business Set-asides in Procurement Auctions: An Empirical Analysis (2009)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:pubeco:v:100:y:2013:i:c:p:28-44

DOI: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2013.01.003

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Public Economics is currently edited by R. Boadway and J. Poterba

More articles in Journal of Public Economics from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().