Bargaining around cost–benefit standards

Ehud Guttel and Shmuel Leshem

Journal of Public Economics, 2013, vol. 103, issue C, 55-67

Abstract: Injurers often purchase the property of potential victims to avoid liability or to comply with regulations. This paper shows that injurers subject to cost–benefit standards could profit from buying out victims even if they attach no value to the victims' property. Because buyouts allow injurers to take fewer precautions, a buyout of one victim produces a negative externality for the remaining victims. Injurers can consequently exploit victims, and thereby reduce social welfare, by adopting a “divide-and-conquer” strategy or by negotiating with victims sequentially. Perhaps surprisingly, buyouts may reduce social welfare and victims' joint profits even if victims make simultaneous or sequential take-it-or-leave-it buyout demands to the injurer.

Keywords: Cost–benefit standards; Divide and conquer; Negative externalities; Public goods (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C72 K2 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2013
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047272713000522
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:pubeco:v:103:y:2013:i:c:p:55-67

DOI: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2013.03.004

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Public Economics is currently edited by R. Boadway and J. Poterba

More articles in Journal of Public Economics from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().