Cash by any other name? Evidence on labeling from the UK Winter Fuel Payment
Timothy Beatty,
Laura Blow,
Thomas Crossley () and
Cormac O'Dea
Journal of Public Economics, 2014, vol. 118, issue C, 86-96
Abstract:
Government transfers to individuals are often given labels indicating that they are designed to support the consumption of particular goods. Standard economic theory implies that the labeling of cash transfers or cash-equivalents should have no effect on spending patterns. We study the UK Winter Fuel Payment, a cash transfer to older households. Our empirical strategy nests a regression discontinuity design within an Engel curve framework. We find robust evidence of a behavioral effect of labeling. On average households spend 47% of the WFP on fuel. If the payment were treated as cash, we would expect households to spend 3% of the payment on fuel.
Keywords: Labeling; Benefits; Expenditure; Regression discontinuity (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D12 H24 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2014
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (35)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047272714001479
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Related works:
Working Paper: Cash by Any Other Name? Evidence on Labelling from the UK Winter Fuel Payment (2012) 
Working Paper: Cash by any other name? Evidence on labelling from the UK Winter Fuel Payment (2011) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:pubeco:v:118:y:2014:i:c:p:86-96
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2014.06.007
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Public Economics is currently edited by R. Boadway and J. Poterba
More articles in Journal of Public Economics from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().