An offer you can refuse: The effect of transparency with endogenous conflict of interest

Melis Kartal and James Tremewan

Journal of Public Economics, 2018, vol. 161, issue C, 44-55

Abstract: We study the effects of transparency on information transmission and decision making theoretically and experimentally. We develop a model in which a decision maker seeks advice from a better-informed adviser whose advice might be swayed by financial incentives. Transparency enables the decision maker to learn whether or not the adviser accepted such an incentive, for example from an “interested” third party. Prior theoretical and experimental research mostly found that transparency is ineffective or harmful to decision makers. Our model predicts that transparency is never harmful and, depending on equilibrium selection, may improve the accuracy of decision makers. In our experiment transparency does indeed improve accuracy, especially if it is mandatory.

Keywords: Experimental game theory; Strategic information transmission; Transparency; Conflict of interest; Lobbying (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (6)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047272718300586
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
Working Paper: An offer you can refuse: the effects of transparency with endogenous conflict of interest (2016)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:pubeco:v:161:y:2018:i:c:p:44-55

DOI: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2018.04.003

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Public Economics is currently edited by R. Boadway and J. Poterba

More articles in Journal of Public Economics from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().