EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

What do self-reports of wellbeing say about life-cycle theory and policy?

Angus Deaton

Journal of Public Economics, 2018, vol. 162, issue C, 18-25

Abstract: I respond to Atkinson's plea to revive welfare economics, and to consider alternative ethical frameworks when making policy recommendations. I examine a measure of self-reported evaluative wellbeing, the Cantril Ladder, and use data from Gallup to examine wellbeing over the life-cycle. I assess the validity of the measure, and show that it is hard to reconcile with familiar theories of intertemporal choice. I find a worldwide optimism about the future; in spite of repeated evidence to the contrary, people consistently but irrationally predict they will be better off five years from now. The gap between future and current wellbeing diminishes with age, and in rich countries, is negative among the elderly. I also use the measure to think about income transfers by age and sex. Policies that give priority those with low incomes favor the young and the old, while utilitarian policies favor the middle aged, and men over women.

Keywords: Happiness; Cantril ladder; Life cycle; Optimism; Transfer policy; Age; Sex (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (36)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047272718300409
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
Working Paper: What do Self-Reports of Wellbeing Say about Life-Cycle Theory and Policy? (2018) Downloads
Working Paper: What do Self-Reports of Wellbeing Say about Life-Cycle Theory and Policy? (2018) Downloads
Working Paper: What do self - reports of wellbeing say about life - cycle theory and policy? (2018) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:pubeco:v:162:y:2018:i:c:p:18-25

DOI: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2018.02.014

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Public Economics is currently edited by R. Boadway and J. Poterba

More articles in Journal of Public Economics from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-24
Handle: RePEc:eee:pubeco:v:162:y:2018:i:c:p:18-25