Using referenda to improve targeting and decrease costs of conditional cash transfers
Jennifer M. Alix-Garcia,
Katharine Sims and
Daniel J. Phaneuf
Journal of Public Economics, 2019, vol. 176, issue C, 179-194
Cost-effective allocation of conditional cash transfers (CCT) requires identifying recipients with low opportunity costs who might change behavior. This paper develops a low-cost approach for improving program implementation by using a stated preference, referendum-style survey question to calculate willingness to accept (WTA) for CCT contracts. We illustrate this in the context of Mexico's Payments for Ecosystem Services Program, and find that the estimated social cost based on WTA is substantially lower than actual payments. Simulation of three geographic targeting approaches shows that joint selection using deforestation risk and WTA could increase program impact under the same budget. We also simulate modified payment schedules based on predicted WTA and demonstrate that these could reduce program cost.
Keywords: Targeting; Conditional cash transfers; Payments for ecosystem services; Stated preference (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q58 Q28 O13 D04 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Working Paper: Using Referenda to Improve Targeting and Decrease Costs of Conditional Cash Transfers (2019)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:pubeco:v:176:y:2019:i:c:p:179-194
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Public Economics is currently edited by R. Boadway and J. Poterba
More articles in Journal of Public Economics from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Dana Niculescu ().