Global poverty measurement when relative income matters
Martin Ravallion and
Journal of Public Economics, 2019, vol. 177, issue C, -
It is becoming well-recognized that relative measures are required for a complete picture of the extent of global poverty and its evolution. The standard assumption is that the national mean or median is the relevant comparison income for setting relative poverty lines. That assumption is questionable. The paper proposes a theoretical model of relative comparisons, which can be downward or upward in the distribution of income. On calibrating the approach to a new data-set on national poverty lines, the Gini-adjusted national mean emerges as the relevant comparison income. Calculations are provided of the implied global poverty measures since 1990. Both non-welfarist (capabilities-based) and welfarist interpretations are provided. Declining poverty incidence is indicated, but at a slower rate than the corresponding absolute measures suggest.
Keywords: Global poverty; Poverty lines; Relative income; Inequality (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I32 O10 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:pubeco:v:177:y:2019:i:c:9
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Public Economics is currently edited by R. Boadway and J. Poterba
More articles in Journal of Public Economics from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Dana Niculescu ().