EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Creditor rights and the outcome model of dividends

Julie Byrne and O’Connor, Thomas
Authors registered in the RePEc Author Service: Thomas G. O'Connor ()

The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 2012, vol. 52, issue 2, 227-242

Abstract: Using a sample of 22,374 firms from 35 countries, we examine the role of creditor rights, shareholder rights, and corporate governance in determining corporate dividend policy. We find that, while all three variables play a significant role in determining both the likelihood and the dividend amount, the effect of country-level creditor rights dominate. In subsequent analysis, we show that the outcome model is most effective in countries with strong creditor rights. When creditor rights are weak, creditors demand, and firms consent to lower dividends. These findings show that creditors, and not shareholders, exert the greatest influence over corporate dividend policy.

Keywords: Dividend policy; Creditor rights; Shareholder rights; Corporate governance (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: G15 G35 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2012
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (14)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1062976912000257
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:quaeco:v:52:y:2012:i:2:p:227-242

DOI: 10.1016/j.qref.2012.04.002

Access Statistics for this article

The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance is currently edited by R. J. Arnould and J. E. Finnerty

More articles in The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:eee:quaeco:v:52:y:2012:i:2:p:227-242