Institutional impact and quote behavior implications of the options penny pilot project

Hakan Saraoglu, David Louton and Richard Holowczak

The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 2014, vol. 54, issue 4, 473-486

Abstract: In this study, we expand the analysis of the impact of the options penny pilot project (PPP) using a sample that covers the first three phases of the project, a control group of options that were not part of the project, and options market specific control variables. We show that proportional national best bid offer spreads decrease significantly for the pilot securities, with the control sample demonstrating a general increase in relative spreads. Regression analysis indicates that a decrease in relative spreads can be explained by the switch to penny quoting. We find that the average quote size significantly declines and most pilot securities experience significant increases in quote traffic during the pilot period. For equity options in the pilot group we do not find a pattern of change in the average trading volume that can be attributed to the PPP. The average trading volume shows a general increase for the ETF options in the pilot group during the pilot period. Based on the findings derived from a sample of opening and closing “large” trades, we do not find conclusive evidence that trading in penny increments has a negative impact on the volume of institutional trading activity on the options exchanges during the first few months of Phase I. Our results for relative spreads, average quote size, quote traffic and trading volume are robust to Phases I–III of the PPP.

Keywords: Penny pilot project; Otions markets; CBOE; Te bid offer spread; Quote depth (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: E52 E58 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2014
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1062976914000398
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:quaeco:v:54:y:2014:i:4:p:473-486

DOI: 10.1016/j.qref.2014.05.001

Access Statistics for this article

The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance is currently edited by R. J. Arnould and J. E. Finnerty

More articles in The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().