 The effect of M&A advisors’ opinions on acquirer shareholder votingWenjing Ouyang The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 2015, vol. 57, issue C, 175-190 Abstract: Recent studies find that merger advisors, in particular those of the acquirer, often face conflicts of interest and present overly optimistic opinions about a deal. It is not clear, however, whether and how these opinions affect shareholders’ voting decisions regarding a deal. The main findings indicate that target advisors’ opinions but not those of acquirer advisors, significantly influence the acquirer shareholders’ approval rate. Acquirer advisors’ opinions tend to be more optimistic, especially when the deal announcement intrigues negative market reaction. However, these opinions are negatively related to the post-merger performance. This paper concludes that acquirer shareholders are able to discern the potential conflicts of interest of merger advisors and follow the advice of more conservative target advisors. Keywords: Merger and acquisition; Shareholder voting; Investment banking; Financial advisor (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:quaeco:v:57:y:2015:i:c:p:175-190 DOI: 10.1016/j.qref.2014.11.004 Access Statistics for this article The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance is currently edited by R. J. Arnould and J. E. Finnerty More articles in The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance from Elsevier |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.