Forecasting quality of professionals: Does affiliation matter?
Aron Veress and
The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 2017, vol. 66, issue C, 159-168
Economists fulfilling a public mission – namely academics, Fed and government employees – demonstrate a tendency towards being pessimistic, whereas bankers in general are overly optimistic about future stock market developments. We show that these characteristics are of particular relevance and statistically significant during economic recessions and stock market downturns. Whilst investment bankers have always shown a tendency towards being optimistic, other affiliations are increasingly following their footsteps and most dominantly so for short-term forecasts. Especially during the most recent crises, their expectations of fast rebounds remained largely unsatisfied, questioning the applicability of economists’ forecasts as we move forward.
Keywords: Business cycles; Implied forecasts; Forecasting quality; Livingston Survey; Out-of-sample statistics (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:quaeco:v:66:y:2017:i:c:p:159-168
Access Statistics for this article
The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance is currently edited by R. J. Arnould and J. E. Finnerty
More articles in The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance from Elsevier
Series data maintained by Dana Niculescu ().