From setback to comeback: Motivations for withdrawn IPO firms to return

Gaole Chen, Ninon Sutton and Jianping Qi

The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 2017, vol. 66, issue C, 259-264

Abstract: Are withdrawn IPOs that return to the market driven by the same acquisition motive as first-time IPOs? We examine the investment decisions of second-time IPO firms after successfully going public. Our findings show that, contrary to first time IPOs, second-time IPOs are not active acquirers and spend significantly more on CAPEX and R&D than first-time IPOs. Unlike acquisitions in the post-IPO period, CAPEX and R&D spending benefit second-time IPOs’ long run performance.

Keywords: IPO; M&A; CAPEX; R&D; Withdraw; Return (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1062976917300935
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:quaeco:v:66:y:2017:i:c:p:259-264

DOI: 10.1016/j.qref.2017.03.002

Access Statistics for this article

The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance is currently edited by R. J. Arnould and J. E. Finnerty

More articles in The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().