Impact of sponsorship on fixed-income fund performance
Mohamed A. Ayadi,
Lawrence Kryzanowski and
The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 2018, vol. 67, issue C, 121-137
Mutual fund sponsors differ in their transparencies (public or private), ownerships (mutual or stock), distribution/servicing channels, affiliations, brand reputational values, manager abilities and access to information. We find that performance differences among Canadian fixed-income funds differentiated by sponsor and fund types are mainly driven by cost minimization and to a less extent by managerial abilities. Funds sponsored by Banks exhibit lower fees and superior return performances, on average, over those sponsored by Insurers, Financial cooperatives, and Independents even after controlling for various fund and sponsor characteristics. Higher benchmark-adjusted returns for bank-sponsored funds are consistent with their lower fees and informational advantages, mainly due to their nation-wide, lower-cost distribution/service channels, and their affiliate activities.
Keywords: Performance; Bond mutual funds; Fund sponsor characteristics; Fund distribution/service; Manager abilities (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: G11 G23 G32 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:quaeco:v:67:y:2018:i:c:p:121-137
Access Statistics for this article
The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance is currently edited by R. J. Arnould and J. E. Finnerty
More articles in The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Dana Niculescu ().