Enforcement mechanisms for SEC reporting deadlines

Derek Dalton, Steve Buchheit, Derek Oler and Ming Zhou

Research in Accounting Regulation, 2013, vol. 25, issue 2, 185-195

Abstract: SEC filing deadlines accelerated for many firms over the past decade; nevertheless, the percentage of late 10-K filings has decreased by historical standards. From 2000 to 2007, six percent of 10-Ks are late but remain SEC compliant (via a Form 12b-25 filing). An additional 2.5 percent of all 10-K filings are both late and non-compliant. When analyzing all 10-K filings (i.e., both timely and late filings), we find that (1) relatively large stock exchanges, (2) greater analyst coverage, and (3) larger audit firms are each associated with improved timeliness and compliance in 10-K report filings.

Keywords: Regulatory compliance; Regulatory enforcement; SEC; 10-K (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2013
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1052045713000209
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:reacre:v:25:y:2013:i:2:p:185-195

DOI: 10.1016/j.racreg.2013.08.007

Access Statistics for this article

Research in Accounting Regulation is currently edited by G. Previts

More articles in Research in Accounting Regulation from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().