Losses and use efficiencies along the phosphorus cycle. Part 1: Dilemmata and losses in the mines and other nodes of the supply chain

Roland W. Scholz and Friedrich-Wilhelm Wellmer

Resources, Conservation & Recycling, 2015, vol. 105, issue PB, 216-234

Abstract: This contribution provides a set of definitions and relates the concepts of losses, efficiencies, efficacy, and effectiveness (which is conceived as a kind of overall utility) in general and for the case of phosphorus. We show how the material—technical and economic value-related definitions are linked and can be utilized for sustainable phosphorus and resource management. Part 1 provides an overview of global anthropogenic and natural phosphorus flows and identifies major losses from the current phosphorus supply–demand chain. We discuss in what way the concepts of efficacy, efficiency, and effectiveness are related and how they may be used for assessing aspects of sustainable management. We discuss losses in mining and consider how management of the mining rate, cut-off grade, and stripping ratio might affect losses today and in the future. Although we identify critical losses of the supply–demand chain, the back sections of the paper focuses on losses in mining and beneficiation. When introducing different types of losses, we illuminate whether the residues in mining should be perceived as losses and whether mining companies can increase the total resource efficiency by decreasing the cut-off grade (i.e., by decreasing the concentration of phosphate ore that becomes subject to mining and beneficiation). This is discussed from an intergenerational justice and external costs perspective of losses. We introduce a classification system for (i) highly probable or definite absolute losses, (ii) losses from the supply–demand chain that become deferred losses, and (iii) uncertain losses that may become subject to sustainable resource management. This classification may be applied to all nodes of the supply–demand chain. We elaborate on how these types of losses can become subject to sustainable resource management. Part 2 of the paper discusses various operationalizations, fallacies, and challenges related to applying different efficiency terms.

Keywords: Phosphorus; Effectiveness; Efficiency; Environmental impacts; Sustainability; Losses in mining; Losses in beneficiation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (6)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344915300975
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:recore:v:105:y:2015:i:pb:p:216-234

DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.09.020

Access Statistics for this article

Resources, Conservation & Recycling is currently edited by Ming Xu

More articles in Resources, Conservation & Recycling from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Kai Meng ().