Just how “wicked” is Beijing’s waste problem? A response to “The rise and fall of a “waste city” in the construction of an “urban circular economic system”: The changing landscape of waste in Beijing” by Xin Tong and Dongyan Tao

Joshua Goldstein

Resources, Conservation & Recycling, 2017, vol. 117, issue PB, 177-182

Abstract: Tong and Tao’s recent article makes the crucial argument that Beijing’s informal rural migrants must be included as citizens and stakeholders if the city intends to successfully upgrade its waste management system. This article aims to deepen their critique, and challenge and clarify several points in their analysis of the system’s development. It concludes that, while urban waste management is always a “wicked” problem, there are some fundamental issues of government mismanagement in China (namely systematic discrimination against rural migrants and municipal and sub-municipal government interests in maximizing land rents) that are by far the dominant reasons for the failure of government waste management policies.

Keywords: Urban waste management; Resources recycling; Beijing (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344916302944
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:recore:v:117:y:2017:i:pb:p:177-182

DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.10.018

Access Statistics for this article

Resources, Conservation & Recycling is currently edited by Ming Xu

More articles in Resources, Conservation & Recycling from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Kai Meng ().