The policy recommendations on cassava ethanol in China: Analyzed from the perspective of life cycle “2E&W”

Tingting Zhang, Xiaomin Xie and Zhen Huang

Resources, Conservation & Recycling, 2017, vol. 126, issue C, 12-24

Abstract: The Chinese government has been implementing the policy of encouraging to use ethanol-blended gasoline as fuels. However, the actual application is still facing lots of challenges. In this study, a well-operated cassava ethanol system in China was chosen as the case study to investigate energy consumption, GHGs emission, and water footprints (“2E&W”) from the life cycle perspective. The status quo and the evolution of China’s policies on bioethanol were also reviewed. Positive net energy value of 13.64MJ/L ethanol and net GHGs emission of 1473gCO2-eq/L ethanol were found for cassava ethanol, which indicates that it could be an excellent substitute for gasoline. Compared with gasoline, using E10 and E85 could have the potential reduce fossil energy usage and GHG emissions. During its life cycle, ethanol conversion is the most energy-intensive and GHGs-intensive stage. The water footprint of cassava ethanol is 2998m3/tonne. Unlike energy consumption and GHGs, the cassava planting stage is the most water-footprint-intensive stage due to the grey water caused by the fertilizer. The life cycle results of cassava ethanol are sensitive to many factors, such as cassava yield, energy input. Finally, some policy recommendations are provided.

Keywords: Cassava ethanol; Life cycle assessment; Water footprint; Energy consumption; GHG emissions (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344917301878
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:recore:v:126:y:2017:i:c:p:12-24

DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.07.008

Access Statistics for this article

Resources, Conservation & Recycling is currently edited by Ming Xu

More articles in Resources, Conservation & Recycling from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Kai Meng ().