Towards greater socio-economic equality in allocation of wastewater discharge permits in China based on the weighted Gini coefficient
Qiang Yuan,
Neil McIntyre,
Yipeng Wu,
Yichao Liu and
Yi Liu
Resources, Conservation & Recycling, 2017, vol. 127, issue C, 196-205
Abstract:
Although there are many methods based on efficiency and equality in allocating discharge permits, developing both reasonable and feasible discharge permit allocation methods remains a challenge. This study proposes an allocation method that aims to achieve equitable allocations with respect to population, land area, environmental receiving capacity, and Gross Domestic Product, which are incorporated into a multi-index Gini coefficient. Previous methodological advances are enhanced by assigning weights to each index using the Analytic Hierarchy Process; and by introducing a new Inequality Factor to quantify the residual inequality. These methods are applied to a case study of chemical oxygen demand discharge permit allocation among 13 cities in Jiangsu Province, China. The allocations obtained by optimizing this method reduce the current level of inequality and are considered more feasible for achieving pollution reduction targets than the equal ratio or average amount benchmark methods. In the case study, the Inequality Factor was used to identify the cities that are the greatest beneficiaries and losers under the allocation scheme. A potential option for improving equality is to relax the constraints imposed on the allocation reductions; however little sensitivity to this was found implying that the limits are not barriers to equality. A sensitivity analysis was conducted to exam the uncertainty in the weights, showing significance for individual cities, but low significance for province-level equality. It is concluded that the integrated use of the Weighted Gini coefficient and Inequality Factor can offer new insights into regional and the city-level equality of discharge permit allocations.
Keywords: Equality; Discharge permit allocation; Weighted gini coefficient; Inequality factor; AHP (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344917302719
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:recore:v:127:y:2017:i:c:p:196-205
DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.08.023
Access Statistics for this article
Resources, Conservation & Recycling is currently edited by Ming Xu
More articles in Resources, Conservation & Recycling from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Kai Meng ().