Environmental impact assessment of six starch plastics focusing on wastewater-derived starch and additives

Martijn L.M. Broeren, Lody Kuling, Ernst Worrell and Li Shen

Resources, Conservation & Recycling, 2017, vol. 127, issue C, 246-255

Abstract: Starch plastics are developed for their biobased origin and potential biodegradability. To assist the development of sustainable starch plastics, this paper quantifies the environmental impacts of starch plastics produced from either virgin starch or starch reclaimed from wastewater. A cradle-to-factory gate life cycle assessment is conducted for six different starch plastic compositions, which include representative amounts of additives such as compatibilisers. Starch plastics are shown to enable reductions in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and non-renewable energy use (NREU), but have higher eutrophication potential and require more agricultural land use compared to common petrochemical plastics. The GHG emissions savings are strongly influenced by the plastic’s composition, with some grades offering an 85% reduction and others an 80% increase compared to the petrochemical counterpart (on a same weight-basis). Additives can account for up to 40% of the GHG emissions of starch plastics. The highest GHG savings are obtained when components such as PBAT and PBS are minimised, while starch, natural fibres and mineral fillers are maximised. Using reclaimed starch instead of virgin starch leads to modest decreases in NREU and GHG emissions (<10% in most cases), but up to 60% reductions in eutrophication and agricultural land use.

Keywords: Starch plastic blends; Life cycle assessment; Reclaimed starch; Bio-based plastics; Additives; Compounding (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344917302793
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:recore:v:127:y:2017:i:c:p:246-255

DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.001

Access Statistics for this article

Resources, Conservation & Recycling is currently edited by Ming Xu

More articles in Resources, Conservation & Recycling from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Kai Meng ().