Characteristics of effective battery recycling slogans: A Swiss field study

Ralf Hansmann, Peter Loukopoulos and Roland W. Scholz

Resources, Conservation & Recycling, 2009, vol. 53, issue 4, 218-230

Abstract: An initial survey (N=183) revealed that overall impressions of 10 different slogans for the promotion of battery recycling were significantly correlated with participants’ survey judgements of their effectiveness. Estimates of slogan effectiveness were positively related with ratings for good and ecological argumentation, creativity, humour, and easy comprehensibility. The overall impression of the slogan was also positively related to these characteristics and, additionally, negatively related to an authoritative wording. The behavioural effectiveness of a humorous slogan urging people to return used batteries, and a prosaic factual slogan informing people that batteries are separately collected were then investigated in a 9-week field experiment in supermarkets (N=21). The informative and easily comprehensible factual slogan achieved an increase of 35.8% in the weight of returned batteries. The prescriptive humorous slogan did not show a positive effect as compared to the pre-intervention baseline. These results contradicted the judgements of the initial survey, where the humorous slogan was better liked and was expected to be more effective than the factual slogan. The results are consistent with previous research, which suggests that factual communication avoids the elicitation of reactance, thereby facilitating behavioural effectiveness.

Keywords: Recycling; Campaigns; Effectiveness; Liking; Persuasion; Slogan characteristics; Humour; Reactance; Factual communication (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2009
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344908002061
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:recore:v:53:y:2009:i:4:p:218-230

DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2008.12.003

Access Statistics for this article

Resources, Conservation & Recycling is currently edited by Ming Xu

More articles in Resources, Conservation & Recycling from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Kai Meng ().