LCA of bioenergy chains in Piedmont (Italy): A case study to support public decision makers towards sustainability

G.A. Blengini, E. Brizio, M. Cibrario and G. Genon

Resources, Conservation & Recycling, 2011, vol. 57, issue C, 36-47

Abstract: Given the booming of bioenergy plants under construction in Piedmont, in Northern Italy, Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) was used in order to assist public decision-makers during the evaluation of new bioenergy projects. Local administrators are in fact worried that public incentives granted to bioenergy producers, regardless of the overall environmental performance, might not encourage technological innovation and eco-efficiency, or bring unwanted indirect environmental effects. A detailed LCA of bioenergy production from dedicated crops (maize, sorghum, triticale and miscanthus) and manure through anaerobic digestion and combined heat and power generation was carried out. The LCA model was particularly focused on the end-of-life of digestate and site-specific data related to the impact of adopted energy conversion technologies. It was confirmed that bioenergy is not automatically synonymous with sustainable energy, as the differences in terms of environmental performance can be remarkable. EROI (Energy Return on Investment) index was estimated to be 3–5. The potential in terms of GHG saving depends on several factors and it is heavily influenced by the reference non-renewable energy to be substituted. End-of-life of digestate was found to be crucial for acidification and eutrophication, but also for GHG emissions. Finally, particulates equivalent emissions were found to be very large in comparison to modern natural gas power plants.

Keywords: LCA; Bioenergy; Biogas; Sustainability; Digestate; Local emissions (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2011
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344911002047
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:recore:v:57:y:2011:i:c:p:36-47

DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2011.10.003

Access Statistics for this article

Resources, Conservation & Recycling is currently edited by Ming Xu

More articles in Resources, Conservation & Recycling from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Kai Meng ().