Shoe manufacturing wastes: Characterisation of properties and recovery options
Fabio Tatàno,
Nadia Acerbi,
Chiara Monterubbiano,
Silvia Pretelli,
Lucia Tombari and
Filippo Mangani
Resources, Conservation & Recycling, 2012, vol. 66, issue C, 66-75
Abstract:
Using the renowned shoe manufacturing sector in Marche Region (Italy) as a case-study, this paper deals with the characterisation of (1) the chemical and physical properties of representative types of shoe manufacturing wastes, (2) the quality profile of a particular material recovery finalised to a soil destination, and (3) the flue gas emissions from burning tests in view of the potential for energy recovery. The property characterisation has primarily revealed the following aspects: a general condition of resulting higher ash contents in shoe waste materials having a mineral or synthetic processing origin; and relatively high energy contents, ranging on the whole expressed as LHV (lower heating value) from 15,710kJkg−1 (for vegetable-tanned leather dust) to 42,439kJkg−1 (for natural rubber). The characterisation of a fertiliser that can be generated from the particular waste type of vegetable-tanned leather dust has determined an interesting quality profile classifiable as organic-nitrogen fertiliser with acceptable values of the humification parameters and heavy metal contents significantly below the assumed quality limits. Finally, simplified pilot-scale burning tests have provided the following findings: higher NOx emissions produced from leather-based materials as compared with the cellulose-based material, which are likely attributable to the substantial “fuel nitrogen” content of the original animal skins; higher HCl emissions produced from the leather-based materials in comparison with the cellulose-based material; and a more even combustion process occurred for the leather dust than for the other shoe materials.
Keywords: Burning test; Emission characterisation; Energy content; Fertiliser quality profile; Property characterisation; Shoe manufacturing waste (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2012
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092134491200105X
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:recore:v:66:y:2012:i:c:p:66-75
DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2012.06.007
Access Statistics for this article
Resources, Conservation & Recycling is currently edited by Ming Xu
More articles in Resources, Conservation & Recycling from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Kai Meng ().