Moving beyond probabilities – Strength of knowledge characterisations applied to security
Tore Askeland,
Roger Flage and
Terje Aven
Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2017, vol. 159, issue C, 196-205
Abstract:
Many security experts avoid the concept of probability when assessing risk and vulnerabilities. Their main argument is that meaningful probabilities cannot be determined and they are consequently not useful for decision-making and security management. However, to give priority to some measures and not others, the likelihood dimension needs to be addressed in some way; the question is how. One approach receiving attention recently is to add strength of knowledge judgements to the probabilities and probability intervals generated. The judgements provide a qualitative labelling of how strong the knowledge supporting the probability assignments is. Criteria for such labelling have been developed, but not for a security setting. The purpose of this paper is to develop such criteria specific to security applications and, using some examples, to demonstrate their suitability.
Keywords: Risk assessment; Security; Probability; Strength of knowledge (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832016307323
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:reensy:v:159:y:2017:i:c:p:196-205
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2016.10.035
Access Statistics for this article
Reliability Engineering and System Safety is currently edited by Carlos Guedes Soares
More articles in Reliability Engineering and System Safety from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().