Optimizing a condition-based maintenance policy by taking the preferences of a risk-averse decision maker into account

Tom Ivar Pedersen and Vatn, Jørn

Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2022, vol. 228, issue C

Abstract: Reasonably accurate remaining-useful-life (RUL) predictions allow for the introduction of maintenance policies where resources, such as spare parts and personnel, are only acquired based on the predicted need. For some assets, such a policy will help reduce the cost of renewals but will also increase the probability of renewal cycles with long downtime and associated large losses. From a decision theoretical point of view decision makers are often risk-averse and therefore their financial risk tolerance should be considered. This paper presents a procedure based on expected utility theory for the optimization challenge. To calculate the expected utility the characteristic function is used to find the full probability mass function of the maintenance cost in a finite time interval. A numerical example and a case study, based on data from an offshore oil and gas platform, are presented to illustrate the proposed model. These examples show that using the long-run cost rate to optimize the presented maintenance policy may lead to decisions that are not in line with the preferences of a risk-averse decision maker.

Keywords: Maintenance optimization; Condition-based maintenance (cbm); Expected utility theory (eut); Wiener process; Characteristic function; Offshore oil and gas (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (10)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832022003982
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:reensy:v:228:y:2022:i:c:s0951832022003982

DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2022.108775

Access Statistics for this article

Reliability Engineering and System Safety is currently edited by Carlos Guedes Soares

More articles in Reliability Engineering and System Safety from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().