 A simplified CREAM prospective quantification process and its applicationXuhong He, Yao Wang, Zupei Shen and Xiangrui Huang Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2008, vol. 93, issue 2, 298-306 Abstract: Cognitive reliability and error analysis method (CREAM), with a sound cognitive model and framework with an emphasis of the whole characteristics of context, is a representative method of the so-called second generation human reliability analysis (HRA) methods and can be used in both retrospective and prospective analysis. For prospective analysis in the context of PSA/HRA, the need of CREAM to provide the results in quantitative terms is seemingly unavoidable. One remaining problem of CREAM as HRA is how to provide an easily practicable process to get the numeric results. This paper provides a simplified CREAM prospective quantification process including the basic method and extended method and their applications in the SGTR event of Qinshan 1 NPP. A comparison is made between the CREAM and THERP in the quantification and a data collection system is proposed to provide a more validated data source for future application of CREAM method. Keywords: CREAM quantification; CPC questionnaires (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:reensy:v:93:y:2008:i:2:p:298-306 DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2006.10.026 Access Statistics for this article Reliability Engineering and System Safety is currently edited by Carlos Guedes Soares More articles in Reliability Engineering and System Safety from Elsevier |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.