EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Why not in your backyard? On the location and size of a public facility

Giorgio Bellettini () and Hubert Kempf ()

Regional Science and Urban Economics, 2013, vol. 43, issue 1, 22-30

Abstract: In this paper, we tackle the issue of locating and sizing a public facility which provides a public good in a closed and populated territory and generates differentiated benefits to households. In the case of a “Nimby” (“Imby”) facility, the smaller is the distance, the smaller (larger) is the individual benefit. Multiple solutions may arise in both cases, and we derive sufficient conditions for uniqueness in both cases. Optimal decisions on location and size are interrelated and depend on the complementarity or substitutability properties of size and distance in the utility function. Then we introduce a common-agency lobbying game, where agents attempt to influence the location and provision decisions by the government. Even when only a subset of households lobbies, the solution of the lobbying game can replicate the optimal solution. Under-provision or over-provision of the public good may be obtained both in the Nimby and the Imby cases. Finally, some non-lobbying households may be better off than in the case where all households lobby, which raises the possibility of free-riding at the lobbying stage.

Keywords: Facility location; Nimby; Lobbies (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: R12 R53 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2013
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (7) Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166046212000932
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
Working Paper: Why not in your Backyard? On the Location and Size of a Public Facility (2008) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:regeco:v:43:y:2013:i:1:p:22-30

DOI: 10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2012.11.001

Access Statistics for this article

Regional Science and Urban Economics is currently edited by D.P McMillen and Y. Zenou

More articles in Regional Science and Urban Economics from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Haili He ().

 
Page updated 2020-09-22
Handle: RePEc:eee:regeco:v:43:y:2013:i:1:p:22-30