Toward more general hedonic estimation: Clarifying the roles of alternative experimental designs with an application to a housing attribute
Michael Eriksen,
Thomas Kniesner,
Chris Rohlfs and
Ryan Sullivan
Regional Science and Urban Economics, 2016, vol. 57, issue C, 54-62
Abstract:
Traditional hedonic estimation approaches are known to be biased when exogenous shocks affect multiple product attributes, the market for the product's complements and substitutes, and aggregate quantity produced. Our research develops a more general hedonic model to recover the marginal willingness to pay for an attribute in the presence of such known hazards to identification based on randomized experiments. Three experimental approaches are introduced on how to estimate attribute demand that address known biases, have transparent identification assumptions, and are feasible to implement. We apply one of the estimators developed to measure the marginal value placed by householders on subsidized carbon monoxide detectors.
Keywords: Hedonic; Identification; Field experiment; Marginal willingness to pay; Heterogeneous goods; Endogenous attributes (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C31 C35 C9 D12 D61 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166046216000028
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:regeco:v:57:y:2016:i:c:p:54-62
DOI: 10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2016.01.001
Access Statistics for this article
Regional Science and Urban Economics is currently edited by D.P McMillen and Y. Zenou
More articles in Regional Science and Urban Economics from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().