Empirical and machine learning models for predicting daily global solar radiation from sunshine duration: A review and case study in China

Junliang Fan, Lifeng Wu, Fucang Zhang, Huanjie Cai, Wenzhi Zeng, Xiukang Wang and Haiyang Zou

Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2019, vol. 100, issue C, 186-212

Abstract: Accurate estimation of global solar radiation (Rs) is essential to the design and assessment of solar energy utilization systems. Existing empirical and machine learning models for estimating Rs from sunshine duration were comprehensively reviewed. The performances of 12 empirical model forms and 12 machine learning algorithms for estimating daily Rs were further evaluated in different climatic zones of China as a case study, i.e. the temperate continental zone (TCZ), temperate monsoon zone (TMZ), mountain plateau zone (MPZ) and (sub)tropical monsoon zone (SMZ). The best-performing model at each station and the overall best model for each climatic zone were selected based on six statistical indictors, a global performance index (GPI) and computational costs (computational time and memory usage). The results revealed that the machine learning models (RMSE: 2.055–2.751 MJ m−2 d−1; NRMSE: 12.8–21.3%; R2: 0.839–0.936) generally outperformed the empirical models (RMSE: 2.118–3.540 MJ m−2 d−1; NRMSE: 12.1–27.5%; R2: 0.834–0.935) in terms of prediction accuracy. The cubic model (M3), modified linear-logarithmic model (M5) and power model (M10) attained generally better ranks among empirical models based on GPI. M3 was the top-ranked model in TMZ and MPZ, while general best performance was obtained by M5 and M2 in SMZ and TCZ, respectively. ANFIS, ELM, LSSVM and MARS obtained generally better performance among machine learning models, with the overall best ranking by ANFIS in TCZ and SMZ and by ELM in MPZ and SMZ. XGBoost (8.1 s and 74.2 MB), M5Tree (11.3 s and 29.7 MB), GRNN (12.3 s and 295.3 MB), MARS (14.4 s and 42.6 MB), MLP (22.4 s and 41.3 MB) and ANFIS (29.8 s and 23.1 MB) showed relatively small computational time and memory usage. Comprehensively considering both the prediction accuracy and computational costs, ANFIS is highly recommended, while MARS and XGBoost are also promising models for daily Rs estimation.

Keywords: Solar radiation; Machine learning; Model comparison; Global performance index (GPI); Computational time; Memory usage (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (38)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032118307226
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:rensus:v:100:y:2019:i:c:p:186-212

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/bibliographic
http://www.elsevier. ... 600126/bibliographic

DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2018.10.018

Access Statistics for this article

Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews is currently edited by L. Kazmerski

More articles in Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().