Dual fluidized bed gasification of biomass with selective carbon dioxide removal and limestone as bed material: A review

Josef Fuchs, Johannes C. Schmid, Stefan Müller and Hermann Hofbauer

Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2019, vol. 107, issue C, 212-231

Abstract: Dual fluidized bed steam gasification is a well-known technology for the thermochemical conversion of biogenic fuels into a valuable product gas comprising hydrogen, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, and methane. Based on the dual fluidized bed gasification principle, further benefits can be obtained by considering the bed material: Limestone allows the removal of carbon dioxide from the gasification reactor and its release in the combustion reactor. Therefore, the gasification and combustion reactors must be operated at 650 °C and 830 °C, respectively. Moreover, this sorption enhanced reforming process affords hydrogen contents of ~70 vol.-%db and allows an adjustment of the hydrogen-to-carbon monoxide ratio in the range of 2–10. The circulating bed material undergoes carbonation and calcination cycles, that lead to a decrease in the carbon dioxide sorption capacity with time. This paper discusses the main reasons for this decrease as well as the positive or negative effects of steam and carbon dioxide. The major disadvantage of using limestone in the fluidized beds is its low attrition resistance. Thus, gentle separation units for the limestone as bed material are recommended to overcome this problem. Several process configurations have been published by different institutions, mainly by IFK Stuttgart and TU Wien. The most important experimental and theoretical results, including the dependence of the product gas composition on the gasification temperature and the bed material cycle rate, tar content in the product gas, and test runs in the industrial scale are summarized and discussed. Sorption enhanced reforming of different fuel types, sorption enhanced reforming with oxyfuel combustion, and performance indicating key figures of the process are also investigated.

Keywords: Sorption enhanced reforming; Carbon dioxide sorption; Limestone; Biomass; Bio-hydrogen (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (14)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032119301467
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:rensus:v:107:y:2019:i:c:p:212-231

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/bibliographic
http://www.elsevier. ... 600126/bibliographic

DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2019.03.013

Access Statistics for this article

Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews is currently edited by L. Kazmerski

More articles in Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().