Worldwide performance assessment of 75 global clear-sky irradiance models using Principal Component Analysis

Xixi Sun, Jamie M. Bright, Christian A. Gueymard, Brendan Acord, Peng Wang and Nicholas A. Engerer

Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2019, vol. 111, issue C, 550-570

Abstract: This study evaluates the performance of 75 clear-sky global irradiance models against 75 ground stations worldwide covering five major Köppen-Geiger climate classifications and overall global performance. After quality control, clear-sky detection and data-availability criteria, there are 4.36 million 1-min valid global horizontal irradiance (GHI) data points for evaluation. This study represents the most encompassing evaluation of its kind in terms of number of models assessed, number of ground stations used, most consistent selection of input variables in terms of temporal and spatial resolution, also using the most rigorous and fair performance assessment criteria and suitable ranking system. A statistically rigorous Principal Component Analysis (PCA) ranking procedure is proposed to replace the conventional ordering method based on single and simple statistics. In particular, it is demonstrated that all 13 error metrics contribute to the variance of GHI estimation and thus must all be accounted for in the ranking procedure. The best performing models in each climate zone of equatorial, arid, temperate, cold and polar are REST2v9.1, REST2v9.1, MAC2, REST2v5 and CLS, respectively. Globally, the top three performing models are MAC2, REST2v5, and REST2v9.1. Many models appear to suffer from over-fitting empirical relationships to training data, resulting in inconsistent worldwide performance. Furthermore, six different formulations of the Linke Turbidity factor (TL) are evaluated through its application to five clear-sky models that require it as an input. The best globally performing TL formulations are either by Ineichen or Gueymard when combined with four of the five Linke-dependent clear-sky models, whilst the Grenier formulation performs best with the Ineichen & Perez model. Significant performance variation is observed depending on the TL formulation selected, hence, careful selection is required for an optimal application. The model codes are available in R [1].

Keywords: Clear-sky irradiance; Clear-sky model; Validation; Linke turbidity; Principal component analysis; Global horizontal irradiance (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (30)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032119302187
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:rensus:v:111:y:2019:i:c:p:550-570

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/bibliographic
http://www.elsevier. ... 600126/bibliographic

DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2019.04.006

Access Statistics for this article

Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews is currently edited by L. Kazmerski

More articles in Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().