Subjective responses to wind farm noise: A review of laboratory listening test methods

Mahmoud A. Alamir, Kristy L. Hansen, Branko Zajamsek and Peter Catcheside

Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2019, vol. 114, issue C, -

Abstract: Laboratory listening tests are a fundamental part of identifying and quantifying human perceptual responses to noise, including wind farm noise (WFN); a low-frequency environmental noise with time-varying components with the potential to impact more people as wind farm facilities continue to expand worldwide. Design characteristics of WFN listening tests vary between studies. This likely impacts WFN listening test results and makes quantitative comparisons difficult between studies. Accordingly, this paper reviews the available literature regarding WFN listening test methods, their overall characteristics and potentially important differences in noise stimuli and rating methods used. The key design variables explored include participant selection, stimuli duration, signal synthesis methods, noise reproduction methods and listening room characteristics. Listening test results from studies that have investigated the perceptual effects of various WFN components such as low-frequency noise and infrasound, tonality and amplitude modulation are presented. The impact on listening tests of factors unrelated to noise such as sensory acuity and sensitivity, attitudes/beliefs and visual effects are also explored. It is shown that some WFN characteristics have received limited attention to date in listening tests. These include broadband low-frequency noise, tonal noise, tonal amplitude modulation and amplitude modulation parameters such as modulation frequency and intermittency. The relative importance of acoustic and non-acoustic factors to human perception is also largely unknown and requires well-designed listening tests to help elucidate.

Keywords: Wind energy; Environmental noise; Wind farm noise; Amplitude modulation; Low-frequency noise; Listening tests; Annoyance (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032119305258
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:rensus:v:114:y:2019:i:c:15

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/bibliographic
http://www.elsevier. ... 600126/bibliographic

DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2019.109317

Access Statistics for this article

Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews is currently edited by L. Kazmerski

More articles in Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().