EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Kernel density estimation model for wind speed probability distribution with applicability to wind energy assessment in China

Qinkai Han, Sai Ma, Tianyang Wang and Fulei Chu

Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2019, vol. 115, issue C

Abstract: A kernel density estimation (KDE) model for the probability distribution of wind speed (PDWS) is proposed in this paper for application to wind energy assessment (WEA) in China. Four bandwidth selectors, including normal scale (NS), plug in, biased cross-validation, and least-square cross validation, are proposed for the KDE model. Popular parametric distribution models are also introduced for comparisons with the KDE models. Based on five-year day-average wind speed data from 698 nationwide wind stations in China, the performance and robustness of both parametric and KDE models were evaluated comprehensively on the regional scale. Wind power density (WPD) and wind turbine power output (WTPO), which are the priorities in WEA, are subsequently calculated based on the estimated PDWS models. The ranking results of four individual metrics and one comprehensive metric indicate that the four KDE models outperform the parametric models in fitting the PDWS. The KDE-NS model performs the best compared to the other three KDE models. In addition to the KDE models, the generalized gamma and generalized extreme values were considered as better parametric models in fitting the PDWS. KDE models also performed well in WPD estimation, especially the KDE-NS model with a mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) value as low as 2%. Some parametric models, i.e., Johnson SB and Wakeby, which are not outstanding in PDWS fitting, however perform well in WPD estimation, and their MAPE values can be controlled to remain within 3%. This indicates that the result of the PDWS is not completely equivalent to that of WPD estimation. The WPD and WTPO in most of China's interior areas are less than 40W/m2 and 1.2 GWh, respectively. In the eastern coastal areas, middle and eastern Inner Mongolia, and some western provinces, the WPD and WTPO are relatively higher, and can reach or exceed 240W/m2 and 3.5 GWh, respectively.

Keywords: Kernel density estimation; Wind speed; Probability distribution; Optimal bandwidth; Wind energy assessment (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (14)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032119305957
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:rensus:v:115:y:2019:i:c:s1364032119305957

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/bibliographic
http://www.elsevier. ... 600126/bibliographic

DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2019.109387

Access Statistics for this article

Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews is currently edited by L. Kazmerski

More articles in Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:115:y:2019:i:c:s1364032119305957