EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Preventing early lock-in with technology-specific policy designs: The Renewable Portfolio Standards and diversity in renewable energy technologies

Jung Eun Kim and Tian Tang

Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2020, vol. 123, issue C

Abstract: While renewable energy (RE) deployment policies can help drive down the costs of RE technologies, they may lead to premature lock-in of the current dominant technology and result in long-term inefficiency. Recent literature has developed a technology-specificity framework to analyze how the technology-specificity level of deployment policies affects technology selection and avoids early technological lock-in. Adopting this framework, we ask whether RE deployment policy designs that specifically target different technology tiers promote RE diversity and avoid premature technological lock-in in the RE market. We examine this research question in the context of Renewable Portfolio Standards (RPS) in the United States, which has a unique design feature of nested technology specificity. Using panel data of 50 states between 1997 and 2016, we examine the effects of the nested RPS designs on diversifying RE technologies and the interactions between different tiers of technology-specificity designs. We find that field-level RPS targets do not have a statistically significant impact on diversifying RE technologies; however, they act as a base for technology-specific RPS designs. Empirical evidence suggests that quantity-based set-aside targets increase in-state shares of the targeted technologies, whereas price-based credit multipliers on competitive technologies have a spillover effect on less competitive technologies.

Keywords: Technology specificity framework; Renewable energy; Technology diversity; Policy designs; Renewable portfolio standards (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (15)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032120300356
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:rensus:v:123:y:2020:i:c:s1364032120300356

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/bibliographic
http://www.elsevier. ... 600126/bibliographic

DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2020.109738

Access Statistics for this article

Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews is currently edited by L. Kazmerski

More articles in Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:123:y:2020:i:c:s1364032120300356