Life cycle assessment of power batteries used in electric bicycles in China

Wenqiu Liu, He Liu, Wei Liu and Zhaojie Cui

Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2021, vol. 139, issue C

Abstract: China has the largest number of electric bicycles (EBs) in the world; they use a considerable amount of batteries. Lead-acid batteries (LABs) are being gradually replaced with lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) in these EBs. It is necessary to explore the environmental impact of these batteries in China. This study quantified the full life cycle environmental performance of LABs (lead-antimony-cadmium, Pb–Sb–Cd, and lead-tin-calcium, Pb–Sn–Ca) and LIBs (lithium-nickel-cobalt-manganese, NCM, and lithium-iron-phosphate, LFP) through the life cycle assessment methodology. The results showed that the material extraction and processing and the battery use stages were the main processes that affected the overall environmental performance. The battery manufacturing and transportation stages had a negligible environmental impact, whereas the battery recycling could increase the environmental benefits of batteries. However, the environmental contribution of the end-of-life (EOL) stage of LIBs was not as good as LABs, especially for LFP batteries. Overall, LFP batteries had better environmental performance except for the highest carcinogenic human toxicity potentials caused by the Cr (VI) discharge from the copper production. Pb–Sn–Ca batteries had the lowest toxic potential to humans and water because of the use of cadmium-free technology. The advantages of NCM batteries over LABs were not obvious currently but had great potential for improvement. Scenarios for cycle life, recycling rate, echelon utilization, and repair and reuse of batteries were established to analyze opportunities to reduce the environmental impact of batteries. Then, several implications were proposed for the development of technology for batteries in EBs.

Keywords: Life cycle assessment; Lead-acid batteries; Lithium-ion batteries; Electric bicycle; Scenario analysis; Echelon utilization (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (6)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032120308807
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:rensus:v:139:y:2021:i:c:s1364032120308807

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/bibliographic
http://www.elsevier. ... 600126/bibliographic

DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2020.110596

Access Statistics for this article

Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews is currently edited by L. Kazmerski

More articles in Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().